INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT OF FUNCTIONAL STABILITY OF WATER TRANSPORT VEHICLES
https://doi.org/10.33815/2313-4763.2025.2.31.064-076
Abstract
The article is devoted to the development of methods and information technology tools for assessing and supporting the functional stability of water transport vehicles to ensure its fault tolerance and survivability based on the interaction of a set of safety indicators and human factor indicators in control and decision-making processes at each of its hierarchical levels. An analysis of research in the field of developing methods and tools as well as their practical application for ensuring the stability of water transport vehicles has been conducted. It has been revealed that currently, a promising direction of scientific research is the development of methods, tools, and information technologies for assessing, monitoring and supporting both the technical and safety states of water transport vehicles and the information and cognitive parameters of the human factor in real time. It has been proven that an important aspect of the successful application of these methods is not only their use in adaptive decision support systems (DSS) for making relevant safety decisions, but also the development of a theory of functional stability, which should be based on modern principles of hybrid intelligence – the symbiotic integration of the functionalities of artificial and natural intelligence. An information-logical model has been developed, and an expert assessment has been carried out according to the degree of importance of a set of stability and safety indicators characterizing fault tolerance and survivability, and indicators of information-cognitive parameters of the human factor that affect the functional stability of a water transport vehicle have been determined. Depending on the state of the specified indicators, a fuzzy Bayesian trust network has been constructed, with the help of which, based on the knowledge of experts, a comprehensive assessment of the probability of the functional stability states of the water transport vehicle has been performed. The practical implementation of the proposed method has been carried out, the results obtained have confirmed its practical value, which can be applied to assess and ensure the comprehensive functional stability of the vehicle. A promising direction for further research is the development of methods and tools for adaptive information technology, which should possess the capability to reconfigure parameters and adaprt to changes in internal and external operating conditions to ensure the functional stability of water transport vehicles.
References
2. International Maritime Organization. Maritime cyber risk management in safety management systems (Resolution MSC.428(98)). 2017. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/ OurWork/Security/Documents/Resolution%20MSC.428(98).pdf.
3. UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch. Annual report: Marine accident recommendations and statistics. 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/maib-annual-report-2022.
4. The White House. Presidential Policy Directive 21: Critical infrastructure security and resilience. 2013. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience.
5. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty. Shipping safety review. 2023. https://www.agcs.allianz.com/news-and-insights/reports/shipping-safety.html.
6. Aven T. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundations. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.
7. Jain P., Pasman H., Waldram S., & Mannan M. S. Process Resilience Analysis Framework (PRAF): A systems approach for improved risk and safety management. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 53, 61–73. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.006.
8. Mokhor V., Bakalynskyi O., Bohdanov O., & Tsurkan V. Interpretation of the simple risk level dependence of its implementation in the terms of analytic geometry. Information Technology and Security, 5(1), 71–82. 2017. https://doi.org/10.20535/2411-1031.2017.5.1.120574.
9. Perederyi V., Borchik E., & Ohnieva O. Information technology for decision making support and monitoring in man–machine systems for managing complex technical objects of critical application. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1246, 448–466. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54215-4_43.
10. Perederyi V., & Borchik E. Information technology for determination, assessment and correction of functional sustainability of the human operator in critical application systems. In Theoretical and practical aspects of the development of modern science (pp. 490–509). 2019. Baltija Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-571-78-7_57.
11. Eling M., & Wirfs J. What are the actual costs of cyber risk events? European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 1109–1119. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.021.
12. Maritime Executive. The importance of psychological safety precautions in maritime. 2023. https://maritime-executive.com/blog/the-importance-of-psychological-safety-precautions-in-maritime.
13. Li P., Dai L., & Li X.-F. Study on operator’s situation awareness reliability in digital NPPs. Part 1. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 102, 168–178. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.12.011.
14. Havlikova M., Jirgl M., & Bradac Z. Human reliability in man–machine systems. Procedia Engineering, 100, 1207–1214. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.485.
15. Pasko N., & Viunenko O. Modeling human–machine interaction in information processing and management systems. European Science, sge17-02, 6–52. 2023. https://doi.org/10.30890/2709-2313.2023-17-02-027.
16. Alali M., Almogren A., Mehedi H., et al. Improving risk assessment model of cyber security using fuzzy logic inference system. Computers & Security, 74, 323–339. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.09.011.
17. Mygal G., & Mygal V. Interdisciplinary approach to the human factor problem. Municipal Economy of Cities, 3, 149–157. 2020. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2020-3-156-149-157.
18. Perederyi V., Borchik E., Zosimov V., & Bulgakova O. Evaluation of the influence of environmental factors and cognitive parameters on decision-making in human–machine systems. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 1, 77–84. 2024. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2024-1-7.
19. Perederyi V., Borchik E., Lytvynenko V., & Ohnieva O. Information technology for performance assessment of complex multilevel systems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2805, 175–188. 2020. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2805/.
20. Perederyi V., Borchik E., Wójcik W. & Ohnieva O. Assessment and information security provision of the decision support process. 2021. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3101, 322–334. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3101/.
21. Murphy K. P. A brief introduction to graphical models and Bayesian networks (Technical Report 2001-5-10). University of British Columbia. 2001. https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Bayes/bnintro.pdf.
22. Parasyuk I. N., & Verevka O. V. Mathematical foundations of probabilistic estimation in fuzzy Bayesian belief networks. Cybernetics
